ECE Webmail
Rubrics
Table 1. ABET Criterion 3 states that:
|
Engineering programs must
demonstrate that their students attain: |
|
| a |
An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering |
| b |
An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data |
| c |
An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability |
| d |
An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams |
| e |
An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems |
| f | An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility |
| g |
An ability to communicate effectively |
| h |
The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context |
| i | A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning |
| j | Knowledge of contemporary issues |
| k |
An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. |
2012-2013
Sampling Instructions for Assessment
Course outcome assessment in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering is based on sampling of the course materials elaborated by the students.Sampling is based on representativeness of course evaluation strategy.
Representativeness refers to how to
choose a given course sample of class material elaborated by
the students or student teams. The sampled material should
be submitted graded and evaluated by the course instructor.
This sample material should be chosen so that, according to
the instructor criteria, it represents the most direct
assessment of the course outcomes sampled in the particular
semester. Professors should refer to courses syllabi on “http://ece.uprm.edu/syllabus/”
to determine if their assigned courses needed to be sampled.
The schedule for sampling is resumed in Table 1 at the
beginning of this document.
One final but extremely important issue is related to confidentiality. Please enclose all the sampled material in a sealed envelope and submit it in person to the accreditation staff in the Department.
Rubric for Outcome a:
An ability to apply knowledge of
mathematics, science, and engineering
Rubric for Outcome b: An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data
|
Students can analyze and interpret results from measurements or simulations: |
|
| 1 |
Given by the professor |
| 2 |
By following instructions to perform an experiment. |
| 3 |
By following instructions to perform an experiment. They can calibrate, configure, and test the instruments to conduct the laboratory work. |
| 4 |
By designing an experiment. Implementation is not required. |
| 5 |
By designing and conducting an experiment. |
|
Given a design problem related to the student's area of study, logical and orderly design procedures are followed which: |
|
| 1 |
Following a given design technique, partially satisfy the problem specifications. |
| 2 |
Following a given design technique, correctly complete a design. |
| 3 |
meets a set of realistic specifications. The design approach is chosen by the student. |
| 4 |
meets a set of realistic specifications, clearly documenting the decision-making process. |
| 5 |
meets a set of realistic specifications, clearly documenting the decision-making process. The design should also consider at least two realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, policies and legal, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability. |
Rubric for Outcome d: An ability to function on multidisciplinary teams
|
Given an engineering problem to be solved by a team of students: |
|
| 1 |
The team solves a simple problem cooperatively. |
| 2 |
The team shows an ability to subdivide a complex problem in parts. |
| 3 |
The team shows an ability to subdivide a complex problem in parts, assign responsibilities, and combine peer work into the solution. |
| 4 |
In addition to 3, the team shows a clear leadership, task distribution and verification, progress review and conflict resolution processes and shows interaction with people from diverse disciplines. |
| 5 |
In addition to 4 the team identifies and seeks out people with relevant expertise. |
Rubric for Outcome e: An ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems
|
Given an engineering problem that might not be completely defined: |
|
| 1 |
Students are able to propose a plausible solution to a previously formulated problem. |
| 2 |
Students are able to propose a plausible solution and solve a previously formulated problem. |
| 3 |
Students can formulate the problem, specify the performance requirements, and propose a plausible solution. |
| 4 |
In addition to 3, the students solve the problem. |
| 5 |
In addition to 4, the students initially identify the problem and justify their choice of solution. |
Rubric for Outcome f: An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility
| 1 |
Given an ethical problem, students can informally analyze the situation |
| 2 |
Students are aware of applicable codes of ethics, such as those of CIAPR, IEEE or ACM. |
| 3 |
Given an ethical problem, students can use applicable codes of ethics, such as those of CIAPR, IEEE or ACM in the analysis of the situation. |
| 4 |
Given an ethical problem, students analyze the ethical situation using applicable codes of ethics and the formal ethical criteria (e.g., least harm, reversibility, and publicity). |
| 5 |
Students can identify a compromising ethical situation, and analyze it using applicable codes of ethics and formal ethical criteria (e.g., least harm, reversibility, and publicity). |
Rubric for Outcome g: An ability to communicate effectively
|
Students are able to communicate graphically using schematics, tables, graphics or mathematical equations: |
|
| 1 |
In a simple context, such as assignments and tests. |
| 2 |
In a simple context, such as assignments, laboratory reports and tests. The student, also communicate their ideas in a writing composition. |
| 3 |
In a medium context, such as short reports. |
| 4 |
In moderately complex context, such as a project report or a well organized public presentation. Their work presents any necessary technical documentation. |
| 5 |
In a complex context, such as a project report or paper, and deliver a well organized public presentation. Their work reflects proper use of the language (Spanish or English), ability to handle the public, and answer questions related to their work. |
Rubric for Outcome
h:
The
broad education necessary to understand the impact of
engineering solutions in a global and societal context
|
The goal of the assessment of this outcome is to measure the capability of students to discuss the social and environmental impact of engineering solutions. The environmental discussion may include protection of the environment, less harm criteria, and EPA regulations. The social discussion may include economic implications (such as entrepreneurship potential, sustainability, usability, and capital-labor issues) or social acceptance of the solution (such as comfort of usage, replacing of products, and protection of equipment from social habits, and public safety). |
|
| 1 |
Given a situation that involves an engineering solution, students poorly discuss the impact of the design on the environment or the social implications as stated in the header of this rubric. |
| 2 |
Given a situation that involves an engineering solution, students can discuss the impact of the design on the environment or the social implications as stated in the header of this rubric. |
| 3 |
Given a situation that involves an engineering solution, students can discuss the impact of the design on the environment and the social implications as stated in the header of this rubric. |
| 4 |
Students can discuss the impact of their design on the environment or the social implications as stated in the header of this rubric. |
| 5 |
Students can discuss the impact of their design on the environment and social implications as stated in the header of this rubric. |
Rubric for Outcome i: A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in lifelong learning
|
Relevant reference resources are cited or included in reports and presentations submitted as part of a project or other assignment. |
|
| 1 |
Reference efforts are limited to a web search or similar cursory effort. |
| 2 | |
| 3 |
The information search includes library references, relevant material or information obtained through personal contact. Alternatively the student succeeded in finding specialized tools, software or hardware. |
| 4 | |
| 5 |
The information developed satisfies the criteria above, and it is discussed, analyzed, and interpreted. Alternatively, students identified a tool and used it effectively. |
Rubric for Outcome j: Knowledge of contemporary issues
|
Contemporary issues may refer to political, economical issues, regulation changes, or emerging technologies that impact the engineering practice. |
|
| 1 |
Discuss a given contemporary issue. |
| 2 |
Student brings an article with a given contemporary issue. |
| 3 |
Students summarize an article of a given contemporary issue. |
| 4 |
Identify a contemporary issue by bringing a summary of an article. |
| 5 |
Identify and discuss a contemporary issue. |
Rubric for Outcome K : An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
|
|||||||||||||
Aprobadas en reunión de Departamento martes, 27 de octubre de 2009.